ilferrari
07-05-08, 04:04 AM
Nice to see someone call out this so-called "genius" and "benefactor" of F1:
Hill claims the amount of money that F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone takes out of the sport makes it unworkable for circuits to finance improvements.
And the former world champion thinks it wrong that Ecclestone keeps the money for himself rather than invest back into facilities like Silverstone.
"There's always been the question of the FOM fee, and ultimately that is the deciding factor," Hill told reporters at Silverstone. "To quote Bernie, he once said: 'You can have anything you like, as long as you pay too much for it,' but we can't pay too much for something.
"We're in it because we want to be there, but we can't go beyond the balance, the tipping point, and Bernie knows that. So it's a huge disappointment, a real blow to our efforts and desire to see the Grand Prix retained."
He added: "The problem is money goes out and away. There's a question whether that money even returns to Formula One. No-one should stand in the way of someone's ability to make a profit, and that's not what this is about.
"But the money from the people (the fans) who come here goes to Formula One, and that money doesn't come back to develop the infrastructure of F1. This (Silverstone) is part of the infrastructure of Formula One.
"The FIA have suggested there are protected events. But there are also circuits that are part of the fabric of motor sport - the very first Grand Prix took place at Silverstone. But none of that money has been re-invested with regard to the infrastructure of the circuits.
"It goes out, and it seems to me to be absurd that that money is constantly being sucked out and not re-invested. We could have had a fantastic venue. It would have been great for everyone. Everyone would have won."
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/68854
Hill claims the amount of money that F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone takes out of the sport makes it unworkable for circuits to finance improvements.
And the former world champion thinks it wrong that Ecclestone keeps the money for himself rather than invest back into facilities like Silverstone.
"There's always been the question of the FOM fee, and ultimately that is the deciding factor," Hill told reporters at Silverstone. "To quote Bernie, he once said: 'You can have anything you like, as long as you pay too much for it,' but we can't pay too much for something.
"We're in it because we want to be there, but we can't go beyond the balance, the tipping point, and Bernie knows that. So it's a huge disappointment, a real blow to our efforts and desire to see the Grand Prix retained."
He added: "The problem is money goes out and away. There's a question whether that money even returns to Formula One. No-one should stand in the way of someone's ability to make a profit, and that's not what this is about.
"But the money from the people (the fans) who come here goes to Formula One, and that money doesn't come back to develop the infrastructure of F1. This (Silverstone) is part of the infrastructure of Formula One.
"The FIA have suggested there are protected events. But there are also circuits that are part of the fabric of motor sport - the very first Grand Prix took place at Silverstone. But none of that money has been re-invested with regard to the infrastructure of the circuits.
"It goes out, and it seems to me to be absurd that that money is constantly being sucked out and not re-invested. We could have had a fantastic venue. It would have been great for everyone. Everyone would have won."
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/68854